Search for: "ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE COURT"
Results 421 - 440
of 10,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules was amended to add a new Article 63-A which gives a Supreme Court Justice, sitting in the County where a person resides, the authority to take away firearms, rifles and shotguns from an individual without that person having been convicted of, arrested for charged with or even having committed any crime. [read post]
The Rule 54(b) Trap: Dealing with Non-final Orders in Cases with Multiple Claims or Multiple Parties
15 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
Effective January 1, 2009, the Arkansas Supreme Court amended Rule 54 [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:55 pm
Rules 26 General Provisions Governing Discovery (See section 26(b)(5)) Iowa Effective September 1, 2008 the Iowa District Court Trial Scheduling Order was amended to address the discovery of electronically stored information. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 9:05 pm
The Court went on to balance some the Defence concerns by ordering that the Plaintiff be responsible for the costs for ‘all procedures undertaken to date which would not have been required or allowed under Rule 68“. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The Constitution thus mandates the procedures provided in its text, even when we might have an alternative method of assuring a desirable outcome. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 11:11 am
The first law, although enacted, provided that it would not become enforceable until the state supreme court or a federal district court ruled as to its constitutionality. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 5:18 pm
In a brief order, Sotomayor indicated that the ruling would be frozen “pending further order” from her or from the full court. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:49 am
District Court struck down the STEM Optional Practical Training (OPT) Extension rule because according to the court, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) failed to follow the procedures required for a new rule. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:08 am
Both would allow a court to issue a temporary ex parte order, and both would allow a final order to last up to a year. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:27 pm
A few days ago, on March 25, 2014, Order in Council No. 126 amended the wording of the Rules. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
” Ultimately, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled against them on the ground that they had failed to follow the proper procedure for seeking a refund, the filing of a claim under Colorado’s Compensation for Certain Exonerated Persons statute (Exoneration Act). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm
Below is a summary of the FISC and FISCR rulings. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:43 am
The grounds for dismissal under this Rule are failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of court. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:22 pm
Effective May 1, 2008, Iowa’s Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to address an increasingly important issue in litigation: Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”). [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:19 pm
The Court welcomes written comments about the proposed amendments. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
Rule 23 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure contains no such provision, Nobles v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
Rule 23 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure contains no such provision, Nobles v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
The federal rules of appellate procedure say a case is a good candidate for reconsideration if it "involves a question of exceptional importance. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 5:16 am
In an Order that goes into effect today, July 1, 2022, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has put into place a new rule amending Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1311.1 to change the maximum limit of what a plaintiff may elect as the value of damages that they can recover in a trial on appeal from an arbitration award.Under the old rule, that limit was set at $25,000.Under the new rule, the maximum limit has been changed to… [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:52 am
Yesterday's ruling consists of a per curiam opinion of the court, a concurring statement, an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part on a separate procedural issue, and three opinions dissenting from the court's conclusion that collateral order jurisdiction was lacking (here, here, and here). [read post]
