Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 421 - 440 of 2,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
In his position as a public officer he owes a duty of fair dealing to the accused and candor to the courts, a duty which he violates when he obtains a conviction based upon evidence he knows to be false. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 7:40 am
Reversed and remanded, with instructions to recalculate the amount of retroactive child support owed to J.A.P.State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Because UTSW viewed the commercial building as unsuitable for its intended commercial purpose, UTSW terminated its lease early, vacated the premises, and relocated to Irving, Texas, while still allegedly owing approximately $250,000 in unpaid rent. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
He was satisfied that the claimant had taken all reasonable steps to notify the defendants who had, in fact, had notice and an adequate time to respond if they chose. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
The burden will then shift to the respondent to rebut the General Counsel’s evidence or calculations, the Board said. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff did not respond to the third counterclaim’s allegation that his efforts to delay turnover of the escrowed funds were contrary to his fiduciary duty as an escrow agent. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
Delahunty & John Yoo The President's Power to Respond to Attacks Michael D. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:06 am by CMS
It took the view that any duty is owed not to the charitable company i.e. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:27 am
In 1989, China allowed a deposition in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am by Thomas Fisher
Fisher is Solicitor General of the state of Indiana, which co-authored an amicus brief on behalf of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
One is New York’s common-law dissolution doctrine as ratified by the Court of Appeals’ 1963 ruling in Leibert v Clapp, authorizing courts to adjudicate a minority shareholder’s non-statutory cause of action for judicial dissolution where the majority shareholders “have so palpably breached the fiduciary duty they owe to the minority shareholders that they are disqualified from exercising the exclusive discretion and the dissolution power given to them by… [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This issue of the adequacy of the professional services provided here requires a professional or expert opinion to define the standard of professional care and skill owed to plaintiff and to establish whether the attorney's conduct complied with that standard (see Tabner v Drake, 9 AD3d 606, 610 [2004]; Ehlinger v Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo, 304 AD2d 925, 926 [2003]; Greene v Payne, Wood & Littlejohn, 197 AD2d 664, 666 [1993]). [read post]