Search for: "P. v. Heard" Results 421 - 440 of 2,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2013, 4:38 am by Heidi Henson
The Supreme Court on April 24, heard oral argument in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v Nassar (Dkt No 12-484), a Fifth Circuit decision examining whether a plaintiff is required to prove but-for causation, or only that the employer had a mixed motive for an employment action, in causes of action where mixed-motive claims are not specifically authorized. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Alex Guerra
On Tuesday, May 12, 2020, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in Freyd v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
I elaborate on these themes at some length in Chapter V of Unprecedented (“Strategizing for the Supreme Court, p. 159″). [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am by CMS
Whilst a large number of criminal cases have been adjourned pending the outcome of this decision, the use of evidence obtained by PH groups has been considered in a previous Scottish decision, namely Procurator Fiscal, Dundee v P H P [2019] SC DUN 39. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:13 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
  In Keller v Citizens Ins Co of America, 199 Mich App 714, 715-716; 502 NW2d 329 (1993) the court found an inadequate causal connection when the plaintiff heard the screech of a vehicle’s tires before the vehicle struck the plaintiff’s child. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:54 am by Nicole Mazzocco
In Angelucci v Dart Properties Inc, the Court of Appeals reluctantly reversed the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to change venue to Macomb County in this multiclaim landlord-tenant dispute, following Provider Creditors Committee v United American Health Care Corp, 738 NW2d 770 (Mich Ct App, 2007). [read post]