Search for: "PATEL v. PATEL"
Results 421 - 440
of 807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2012, 9:06 am
[1] Patel, V. and Kaufman, D.R. (2000) Clinical reasoning and biomedical knowledge: implications for teaching, in: J. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Bank Markazi v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:01 am
The complaint, as amplified by the plaintiffs’ evidentiary submissions in opposition to the defendants’ motion, contained only conclusory allegations, without any factual basis, that the defendants acted to deceive the court when submitting the Kamisher and Lovy affidavits in the prior action (see generally Patel v Gardens at Forest Hills Owners Corp., 181 AD3d 611, 613 [2020]). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
The Defence must be more than merely arguable – see ED & F Man Liquid Products v Patel [2003] EWCA Civ 472 at [8]. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:28 pm
Gray v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:48 am
Wilkins-Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 4:13 pm
In Levitt v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:13 pm
In Levitt v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
A good example of this is the Airbus v Patel litigation, which concerned the crash of an airliner made by Airbus at Bangalore airport. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:49 pm
Patel. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 3:39 am
Patel Engg. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
We see this in the case of Ransom v. [read post]
21 May 2022, 5:28 am
by Iris Malone (@irisemalone) Technology Policy A Quantum Sputnik Moment by Nima Leclerc Surveillance and Reproductive Rights With Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:14 am
Patel. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:47 pm
In mid-August a federal court in San Jose (the Northern District of California) sided with the movie studios against Real, issuing a permanent injunction, and holding in a well-reasoned opinion in RealNetworks, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
In Patel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 9:26 am
Super 8 Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 6:51 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:33 am
The case is Patel v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
We see this in the case of Ransom v. [read post]
