Search for: "PEOPLE v. TAYLOR" Results 421 - 440 of 1,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000), because the petitioner here did not have a "nightmarish" childhood. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:54 am by Siobhan Hayes
Caselaw - rectification of the register In February 2014, we saw two judgments from the Supreme Court (Taylor v Betterment Properties (Weymouth) Limited and Adamson & Others v Paddico): In the Weymouth case, Betterment Properties succeeded in their application for deregistration of land as a TVG, therefore the land in question will no longer be protected from development. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
Accordingly we accept the thrust of Mr Norton-Taylor’s second submission, if not the precise wording. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
  |  The 17th draft of UPC Rules of Procedure.Never too late 18 [week ending Sunday 2 November] -- The Limerick Competition results | More on CJEU in BestWater | The GC in Laguiole | France to review its IP Code | Reports on the “no patents round-up for non-techie people” event | Renting an orphan work in the UK | Aldi and look-alikes | The UK Supreme Court in Servier v Apotex | Are patent trolls really a… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by ACLU
Reproductive rights remain under attack and the struggle for gender equal medical care is ongoing — as further illustrated in the Supreme Court’s most recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:57 am
I'm kind of enjoying the People Magazine approach for a while while he's out of pocket.CDR Klant let me know today that former Air Force Captain Dale Noyd (Noyd v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:37 am by SHG
As of July 29, 2020, police have shot to death 111 black people and 215 white people. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:24 am
For example, in Taylor v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 9:54 am by mdkeenan
In People v Taylor, the officer essentially placed the PBT device in front of defendant’s mouth without asking the defendant to take the test or giving the defendant enough time to refuse. [read post]