Search for: "PEREZ V JUSTICE" Results 421 - 440 of 548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Thomas filed a separate dissenting opinion in which Justice Alito joined (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Wuerth notes that in the 2015 case of Sachs v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Perez, 541 So.2d 652, 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (holding claimant has burden to prove “the quantity, quality and duration of attendant services claimed”)). [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Perez, 541 So.2d 652, 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (holding claimant has burden to prove “the quantity, quality and duration of attendant services claimed”)). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
Perez reflects Judge Kavanaugh’s deep skepticism of the institutions that Congress designed to protect American workers. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:30 pm by Michael Lowe
  For details, read the online comparison dataset compiled by the Health in Justice Action Lab and Legal Science. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 10:09 am by Gary Watt
Perez (2008)166 Cal.App.4th 444 (upholding cost shifting under 998 offer served with summons and complaint). [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
Katfriend Guido Noto La Diega (Northumbria University) looks into issues of registration for olfactory marks at the EU and UK levels.Here’s what Guido writes:“In the UK, whereas in theory olfactory trade marks can be registered, there have not been successful applications since the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
 Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
  Mensing was discussing the FDA’s formal litigation position, taken by the Department of Justice in an amicus curiae brief filed in that case at the express behest of the Supreme Court. [read post]