Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER"
Results 421 - 440
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2009, 10:07 am
As copyright holder, Bavaria has refused to allow the book to be republished in its entirety, on the grounds that it would promote right-wing extremism. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Most noticeable there is the ongoing Costco v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
She was a career trial attorney in the Division between 1997 and 2006 [overlapping Jamie Gorelick and Eric Holder’s respective terms as Deputy Attorney General and Bill Baer’s term as head of the FTC Competition Bureau], during the last four years of which she served as the Chief of the Networks and Technology Section. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” Peter Spero, Asset Protection: Legal Planning, Strategies and Forms, 6.08[2] (Warren Gorham & Lamont, 2007), citing 2 A. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” Peter Spero, Asset Protection: Legal Planning, Strategies and Forms, 6.08[2] (Warren Gorham & Lamont, 2007), citing 2 A. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
Indeed, I remained an avid Os fan until about 2000, when I finally was no longer able to stomach what Peter Angelos was doing to the team. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
These included efforts by the proposed user to obtain authorization from the rights holder within a reasonable period of time – a requirement that may be waived by a WTO member during national emergencies or other circumstances of extreme urgency, which were undefined. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am
The plan was negotiated in advance with holders of 83 percent or more of the first- and second-lien debt. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
His work is going towards First Amendment because the other alternatives won’t get the job done and the present solution risks a serious chill.53 cell phone search cases found in his search for reported opinions after Arizona v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The sense shift is perhaps via Medieval Latin confusion of impedicare with Latin impetere "attack, accuse" (see impetus), which is from the Latin verb petere "aim for, rush at" (from PIE root *pet- "to rush, to fly").The Middle English verb apechen, probably from an Anglo-French variant of the source of impeach, was used from early 14c. in the sense "to accuse (someone), to charge (someone with an offense). [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
During oral argument, Judge Peter Messitte in Maryland cited our brief, and asked the plaintiffs why they did not bring suit against Trump in his individual capacity. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:51 am
At this point, it is hard to discern which side of the argument is 100% accurate; however, legislature can take a first step in at least acknowledging the rights of performers as it does other holders of copyrights of the same song. [read post]
