Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER"
Results 421 - 440
of 481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:28 pm
Mellow Beverage Co., LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com
Trust for the Certificate Holders of the Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:14 pm
The parties to the Authors’ Guild et al. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
Peter Shipley is a Bay Area hacker and patent-holder who sues technology companies under the corporate name Enhanced Security Research, LLC. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 8:30 am
This is according to Peter Brantley, the Internet Archive’s director. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
S’holders Derivative Litig., 886 A.2d 1271, 1273 (Del. 2005) (citing Sugarland Industries Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:45 pm
"Running On Empty" was not the only song that the McCain Campaign used without a copyright holder’s permission before the 2008 Presidential Election. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
It's put together by some very smart people who work with orphans day in and day out (including our own Peter Hirtle). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:09 pm
It's put together by some very smart people who work with orphans day in and day out (including our own Peter Hirtle). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:27 am
See Peter Pan Fabrics v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
(IPEG) USPTO reform at WIPO: New PCT procedures being proposed for PCT II (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) WIPO Patent Cooperation Committee to proceed with study of PCT with constraints (Intellectual Property Watch) Developing a foreign filing strategy (Intellectual Property Watch) Want to obtain patents to protect you from competitors knocking off your innovative products or technology? [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
v. [read post]
