Search for: "POTTER v. POTTER" Results 421 - 440 of 964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 5:23 am by INFORRM
Notably, in Bloomsbury Publishing Group Ltd v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2003] 1 WLR 1633, where unknown persons had obtained copies of the then unpublished book “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” and attempted to sell extracts of them to various newspapers, the trial judge (Sir Andrew Morritt V-C) held that it was not material that the description of persons unknown might apply to no-one and made the order against the person or persons who… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
US could be endangered by US v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:51 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided on Thompson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And concluded that what Potter Stewart's "concurring Brothers" demonstrated in 1972 was true. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:52 am
From Quidditch to Quids In: Potter prevails as detractors fail to make payment into court Around the blogs. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:50 pm by T. Doyle
The Court answered in the affirmative in both cases.In Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:51 am by Gregory Forman
 Like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of pornography in Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:49 am by jonathanturley
That lunacy was summed up in the ridiculous statement of Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 9:08 am
Supreme Court also denies numerous petitions for review with today's orders.FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. [read post]