Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 421 - 440
of 4,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Third, if the court used 7,400 clickthroughs as the numerator (which is still not precise, because a single prospective client might have clicked multiple time), the rate of actual confusion increases to 3.2%. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) has long sought a standard where all communications and content must meet the warrant standard. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:39 pm
This is a follow-up to what I wrote four weeks ago, Federal Circuit calls into question whether ITC should impose import bans on willing licensees' products infringing standard-essential patents: Thales v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
Guglielmino v McKee Foods Corporation, No. 05-16144 (9th Cir. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
This detracted from the more common ‘telling’ approach that central Government uses when it issues prescriptive policy guidance. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:41 pm
The standard is SUPPOSED to be — was the invention obvious at the time of invention. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
The second issue here concerns what precise mens rea standard suffices for the First Amendment purpose at issue. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:08 pm
Citing Coghlan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:11 am
I was also amused by: "The pubic hair is often used for a background to the most vivid and precise descriptions of the response, condition, size, shape. and color of the sexual organs before, during and after orgasms." [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
A three-judge panel agreed in Mandel v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:53 pm
Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am
Jing Recent Anti-SLAPP Developments Why I Support HR 4364, the Proposed Federal Anti-SLAPP Bill Griping Blogger Gets Fair Use and Anti-SLAPP Win–Sedgwick v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:47 am
Yet, these terms are often not precisely defined. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 12:14 pm
A recent case, Pinder v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:22 am
Counsel for the plaintiffs in BP v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:05 am
This case presents an ideal opportunity for this Court to demonstrate that under the right circumstances, a creator of lighting designs can meet the elevated standards of the Copyright Act for protection of useful articles under the minimal standards for stating a cause of action of infringement under Fed. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 11:05 am
Department of Labor v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:42 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:09 am
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:53 am
Grant that Bretton Woods was an act of calculation on the part of the US (or more precisely, on the part of Harry Dexter White). [read post]
