Search for: "PROCESSED PLASTIC V US" Results 421 - 440 of 493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2010, 7:09 am by Chuck Becker
  Certainly a lessor of plastic totes knows that a company might use the totes to store solvents that might be spilled or otherwise released. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Users aren’t always innovators: 77% in scientific instruments, 10% in engineering plastics. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
– EPA News Release, May 6, 2010 A metal engraving and electroplating company in North Kansas City, Mo., has agreed to pay a $31,612 civil penalty to settle allegations that it failed to file annual reports with EPA and the State of Missouri disclosing the types of toxic chemicals that were manufactured, processed or otherwise used at its facility. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
Serio-US Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:47 am by Jon Hyman
– from Michael Fox’s Jottings By An Employer's Lawyer The other big story of the week – also at the Supreme Court – was the oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 6:32 pm by Matt Cameron
Anyone who hated Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
The company’s Wallingford plant contained a production line that used to manufacture resins. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The City argued that under the Court's prior holding in Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v County of Suffolk (77 NY2d 761 [1991]) that Petitioners lacked standing because the closest of them lives half a mile from the project. [read post]