Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW"
Results 421 - 440
of 4,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2023, 5:00 am
The second issue that the U.S. government has raised is algorithm bias or algorithm manipulation. [read post]
18 May 2023, 10:41 am
Some of the best were when I read a New York Times op-ed by a law professor named Michael McConnell this past Sunday, in which he repeated almost verbatim some weak arguments that he had made in 2012. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:30 am
I suspect that most professors who assign the problem end up endorsing purposivism and reject a wooden textualism. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
Indeed, turning back to the Ninth Amendment for a moment, both Professor Barnett and my former teacher Professor Dan Farber believe the Ninth Amendment itself protects individual rights, but they disagree on what those rights are. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:02 pm
Professor Dorf pointed out that in fact the debt ceiling statute is a separate section of the U.S. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The President’s choices if he prioritizes would and should be second-guessed. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Const. amend. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The bill states, again in Section 1, that: The amendments in this act are declarative of and clarify existing law. [read post]
15 May 2023, 8:00 am
Second, Trump's presidency led me to suggest a minor amendment to our original model. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:09 am
Challengers to the constitutionality of Section 702 almost always speak in terms of the surveillance as “warrantless” and lacking “particularity”—terms found in the Fourth Amendment but specific to the Amendment’s historic role in regulating searches and seizures related to law enforcement. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am
I've been a VC reader since my second year of law school (which was also the VC's second year!) [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Maybe there have been many elephants out there all along, not even hidden in mouseholes.In any event, Professor Galle may be onto something by invoking constitutional avoidance. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:22 pm
“The Second Amendment Allows a Ban on the AR-15; Ordinary people don’t carry semiautomatic rifles for self-defense”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion. [read post]
11 May 2023, 1:50 pm
I groaned upon reading that, given how much Professor Dorf and I have been emphasizing recently that the Fourteenth Amendment argument is sufficient but unnecessary -- as well as being a clear second-best to our least-unconstitutional argument, which is based on separation of powers concerns. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Professor Alexander I. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
I’d written the definitive book on media censorship in Canada during the Second World War — a project that involved a lot of law, including the War Measures Act — and had spent twenty years on Parliament Hill, watching law being made. [read post]
6 May 2023, 6:30 am
The second liberal value that Suk interrogates is that of legal equality, adjudicated in courts. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm
The judge held that the law—which was passed after a 2022 mass shooting in Highland Park, Illinois—“completely obliterates” the Second Amendment right to bear arms. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Second, corporations increasingly employ AI technologies to influence human behavior, whether as consumers, investors, or political actors. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:54 am
For administrative law practitioners and those interested in the APA section 553(e) and agency clarity and accountability, Coinbase’s mandamus action is one to watch. [read post]
