Search for: "PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2018, 7:45 am
In 1951, six companies from Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi formed the Entergy Corporation, a publicly held utility company intended to share the costs and benefits of generating and transmitting power. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
Fish and Wildlife Service next term. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Federal election law prohibits companies from providing free services to lawmakers. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Application of the commissioned sales employee overtime exemption to a company that sells an internet payment software platform. 5. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
As Chief Justice Roberts observed in McCutcheon v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
It chooses the free speech interests of powerful corporations over those of the public. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Several patent-related cases, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
United States, which upheld for-cause protection for members of the War Claims Commission, and 1988’s Morrison v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
Notably in this regard, his opinions suggest strong support for the speech rights of corporations, including digital-content providers. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
And (2) to what extent should the regulation of corporations be left to the market, to private ordering (contract law) among corporate stakeholders, or to public regulation by the state? [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:15 am
The Federal Election Commission for some time even equivocated on the question of whether a foreign national could volunteer personal services to a campaign. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Generous public pensions, meanwhile, are beginning to catch up with the state, particularly as the population declines. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
And in Houston v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
” (citations omitted)); see also, Green Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
For example, in VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
Because of its massive reach across much of the world, the platform can effectively censor public speech, perform psychological experiments, and potentially sway elections on the scale of a nation-state. [read post]
