Search for: "Palmer v. Palmer"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2009, 8:50 am
Is it like Palmer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
Co. of Am. v Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, 80 NY2d 377, 380-381 [1992], rearg denied 81 NY2d 955 [1993]). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:52 am
In this week’s case (Dunne v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 10:50 pm
Palmer, 33 N.J. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:29 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Richard v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 2:02 pm
Palmer. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:17 pm
The rule cites Sylvester v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Butler, John Edward Fowler Distinguished Professor of Law and International Affairs, Pennsylvania State UniversityEDITORIAL BOARDJean Allain, Queen's University, Belfast Olga V. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
Alyson Palmer is doing a great job covering the 11th Circuit appointment process. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984). [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:58 am
App. 3d 728, 733-734 (referencing Palmer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 10:21 pm
A. 2, 1961) KK 58-60 at 106 and 35 Palmer v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:40 pm
Yes, although this Palmer v. [read post]
