Search for: "Parente v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 421 - 440
of 596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 10:23 am
Schwarzenegger (now Perry v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Board of Education, used the arguments he developed for Mendez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:19 pm
V&A Museum no. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
For the board, this explains why it was possible that e-mail C5 corresponding to the final feature of current claim 1, i.e. the feature of claim 5 of the parent application (just like C3 corresponding to current claim 3, i.e. the feature of claim 7 of the parent application), could be sent on 25 January 2000 (C3: 17 January 2000), i.e. before the filing date of the parent application on 1 February 2000, from Mr de Vries of AkzoNobel to Mr Mooij, the representative… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
Do the math… $6,000 a month… equals $72,000 a year… by loaning the same $100,000 twelve times and selling all twelve loans to Wall Street bankers. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:33 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett (8 ADD ¶8-198). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:46 am
In the 2006 case Garcetti v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:13 pm
On February 7, in a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a District Court’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
In 2009, in Houseman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
Board of Education effectively overturned Plessy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Board of Education although not Loving v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Aetna Life Insurance, Emprise, Inc., Texas State Medical Board, and the United States Government, and was found not guilty in all 5 cases, you will wish you never wrote your article. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
New York City Board of Education, 11-386. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
It seems that Florida’s Board of Education has a policy of barring American citizens who live in Florida from receiving in-state tuition if their parents cannot prove they legally immigrated here. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
The case, Armour, et al., v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
The realities of the parties control the equation, and here they’re not comparable in sophistication; the reasonableness of her reliance we just cannot gauge with a yardstick of equal experience and age. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:02 am
the Supreme Court concluded that the proposition that before a parent can be compelled to contribute towards the cost of a private college there must be a showing that a child cannot receive an adequate education at a state college is a doctrine that in many cases is harmful to the children of divorced parents, acts to discriminate against them, and is largely unworkable. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
Smith, in which two same-sex parents had asked the Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s holding that Louisiana’s refusal to list both of them as parents on their child’s birth certificate did not violate either the Full Faith and Credit or Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
