Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 421 - 440
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court in Katz relied on Bell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
In my example, the figure is $50,000 x .062, or $3,100.00. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm
His Honour Judge Bellamy’s criticism at paragraph 193 of L (A Child: Media Reporting), Re [2011] EWHC B8 (Fam) of The Daily Telegraph’s Christopher Booker’s reporting of the case as “unbalanced, inaccurate and just plain wrong”, a criticism supported by Sir Nicholas Wall in X, Y, and Z & Anor v A Local Authority[2011] EWHC 1157 (Fam) at paragraph 102. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am
The notice also included certain conditions (eventually deemed “commercially reasonable” by Justice Borrok) that the purchasing member assume any guarantees given by the selling member of loans made by third-party lenders to PTP. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm
So if one party controls both houses of Congress—even by a single vote—CRA resolutions can be adopted on a party-line vote. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:32 am
NYT v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Swiss-type claims take the form:"use of a drug X in the manufacture/preparation of a medicament for the treatment of disease Y"EPC 2000 claims take the form of: "Drug X for the treatment of disease Y"The European Patent Office's Technical Board of Appeal (TBA) have told us that these claims are not synonymous in scope (see T 1780/12 - University of Texas) and you cannot amend from one to another. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
[Y] by order of SPDC and / or a representative of SPDC attended the meeting (s) where these witnesses had to prepare / sign the statements prepared by others and / or [b.] [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Must it be too expensive for the public system to absorb, or is it enough that the government has decided to fund procedure x over treatment y, both being equally medically effective? [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Many of these examples are more about association or dilution than confusion—this person stood for X and is being used for Y. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:14 am
Speech beyond “I will sell you X good at Y price” can be commercial, depending on the circumstances. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
Here are some examples that I bet every care lawyer has seen at least once : social worker sitting in their car around the corner from a family home waiting to see if the violent ex turns back up and is let in, or if his car is still there in the morning, or routinely arriving a few minutes early to see if they can catch them out. social worker on unannounced visit when family are out peering in the window and recording the carnage they see inside - or peering over the gate to see if that mouldy… [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Mechanisms exist for “circumventing strict application of consent” by the party states. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
V Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
While one might argue that the class action mechanism renders such knowledge defenses irrelevant as a matter of collateral estoppel, a class benefitting from the Basic presumption is never accurately defined merely as purchasers between dates “X and Y,” but rather should be defined as purchasers between dates “X + Y, who did not know or believe that the misrepresentation was false or that an omission occurred. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
It is almost impossible to know, with certainty, who the two people in the conversation really were - "even if a user believes that "UTFan" is Person X, Person Y may have hacked into the UTFan username. [read post]
