Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 421 - 440
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am
” Q is for the Queen v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:09 am
On Tuesday, the Court handed down Mohawk Industries Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
(2) In writing or by electronic mail, the names and addresses of all of the third parties that received personal information from the business for the third parties' direct marketing purposes during the preceding calendar year and, if the nature of the third parties' business cannot reasonably be determined from the third parties' name, examples of the products or services marketed, if known to the business, sufficient to give the… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:28 am
 On Tuesday, 25 August 2009, Capt X contacted Sgt Y via an online social networking site, Facebook. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
There, Arnt was charged with murder (X, the greater offense) as well as voluntary manslaughter (Y, the lesser offense) and, as here, the jury acquitted on X but convicted on Y. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 9:04 am
Stan Y.. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
They basically create a contingency, where a party has no obligation to perform X until condition Y occurs first. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
Further, the facts are such that a default by one party X is occasioned only by the default of the other Y (say, where X has to transfer possession of land to Y; Y has to construct a building on that land - X refuses to hand over possession). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 12:01 pm
Imagine that X and Y have a joint bank account. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:40 pm
Unless Party X assigned the patent to Party Y. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 10:56 am
In Box v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 8:06 am
' or 'How has X or Y affected your job? [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
X. or Dr. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:59 pm
Y., Dr. [read post]
16 May 2009, 11:20 am
X. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:53 am
An independent investigator may initially believe the outcome could either be x or y. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
[X] reported him to the FBI. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:12 am
X v LB Hounslow [2009] EWCA Civ 286. [read post]
