Search for: "Paul Branch "
Results 421 - 440
of 1,808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
John Allen, the president of the Brookings Institution and co-chair of the Homeland Security Advisory Council Subcommittee for the Prevention of Targeted Violence Against Faith-Based Organizations; Paul Goldenberg, co-chair of the Homeland Security Advisory Council Subcommittee for the Prevention of Targeted Violence Against Faith-Based Organizations; Eugene Kontorovich, a professor at Antonin Scalia Law School; and Clifford May, the president of the Foundation for the Defense of… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:12 am
JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE NAVAJO NATION Staff Attorney, Chinle Judicial District, Chinle AZ. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:04 am
And more recently, in Paul v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
A Brief History of Regulation and Deregulation March 11, 2019 | Susan Dudley, George Washington University Ever since Congress created the first federal regulatory body more than 130 years ago, people have debated the proper role for what has been called the “fourth branch” of government. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:04 am
We expect a second round of amicus briefs in support of the Bureau’s constitutionality to be filed after Paul Clement, the amicus curiae appointed by the Supreme Court to defend the Ninth Circuit’s judgment upholding the Bureau’s constitutionality, files his brief. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:22 am
Pauls final advice is that if you simply do not have time to be a professional landlord you should use a managing agent. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am
November 27, 2019 – Kupperman moves to add Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving as a co-defendant. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:22 pm
Paul agreed with the latter point, as did Ford. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
The Seattle Times (Crystal Paul) reports: Community members including transgender locals and trans allies have inundated the Seattle Public Library with calls and emails, asking the library system to cancel an upcoming event hosted by the Women's Liberation Front—a self-described "radical feminist organization" that has publicly espoused what critics call anti-trans views. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
On Nov. 26, Judge Michael H. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 8:41 am
Yesterday at the colloquium, Deborah Paul presented "Has Helen's Ship Sailed? [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:57 am
Samuel Patten pleaded guilty to violating FARA on behalf of the Opposition Bloc, a Ukrainian political party, for failing to register under FARA, even though he contacted members of Congress, the executive branch, and news media. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:02 am
Isom's failure to make any objection at the time "is a consideration in evaluating" whether to grant certiorari, she writes, even though that was not the basis of the Arkansas Supreme Court's rejection of the claim.In Paul v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:27 am
[The DACA cases squarely present the question of whether Congress delegated the authority to resolve such a major question about immigration policy] This morning, Justice Kavanaugh issued a statement respecting the denial of cert in Paul v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:45 am
Unsurprisingly, the Court also denied certiorari in a parallel non-delegation case, Paul v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote on behalf of the Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 11:02 am
Her legal team had asked the State Department to provide a written statement addressing their concerns regarding “executive branch confidentiality interests,” but the Department never provided such a statement. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 9:14 am
Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Paul Ryan, and a number of the President’s supporters in the business community argued in favor of continuing DACA. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:19 am
He seems to view the courts and the justice system as obstacles to be attacked and undermined, not as a coequal branch to be respected even when he disagrees with its decisions.'"WaPo reports.How do you get to be a federal judge and think the expression is "unchartered territory"? [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Democrats argue the Trump administration’s stonewalling –including trying to stop subpoenaed witnesses from testifying and blocking the executive branch from turning over documents – creates a strong case the president has infringed on the separation of powers and undercut lawmakers’ oversight duties as laid out in the Constitution. [read post]
