Search for: "People v Childs" Results 421 - 440 of 7,012
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 6:52 am by Renee Newman Knake
The Supreme Court considered this question yesterday during oral argument for Turner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
  But I do think she knew it was "wrong" to spit at other people and to kick them in the stomach? [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:07 am
Code § 2256 as referring to real people. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has reversed a child pornography conviction in United States of America v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
 And it's technically not part of the crime at all, which was done and over by the time the police found him.But Justice Lui persuasively argues -- to me, anyway -- that the video is relevant to refute defendant's story at trial that he attacked the victim because the victim was a drug-dealing child molester. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 1:19 pm
. -- are far more substantial.But the guy did get busted for having the pump and dildo, and ended up getting thrown in the pokey for 60 additional days as a result.His defense was that he needed the pump to get an erection, and that the dildo was his girlfriend's -- the latter defense confirmed by the girlfriend herself, though apparently rejected by the trial court.Do I want a child molester to get erections? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
., in criminal wiretap and child abuse cases) -- does indeed appear in Westlaw's databases, including over 200 times in the ALLCASES file. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm by Liisa Speaker
’” People v Gioglio, 296 Mich App 12 (2012), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 688, 694; 104 St Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
Kenji YoshinoFor the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries In my intervention, I plan to unpack the “child-protective” argument relating to same-sex marriage by using the case study of Hollingsworth v. [read post]