Search for: "People v Crowe" Results 421 - 440 of 534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 5:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
Crow Tribe is ripe for reexamination, if not outright reversal. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
 Thus, in the 1991 case of Rust v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:52 am
Most ordinary people do not distill out functional elements from design elements when looking at products. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:26 am by Erin Miller
For fifty-two years it stood for the aspiration that we, as a people, were constitutionally committed to redressing the wrongs of slavery and Jim Crow. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am by Erin Miller
”  More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 4:29 am by Alfred Brophy
One of the things that interests me are the phrases on the monument, "Jim Crow Law," "Black Codes," "Lynching," "Sharecropping," then later on, a few panels down, there's Briggs v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm by Andrew Koppelman
From 1841 to the present, the principle use of the filibuster has been to defend Jim Crow laws oppressing African Americans. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:51 am by Jeff Gamso
The press release crows about a victory. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:14 am by admin
Well, I guess they’re on the same side now, except that one gets NYTimes Op-Ed ink: Ten for the Next Ten A decade’s worth of music file-sharing and swiping has made clear that the people it hurts are the creators — in this case, the young, fledgling songwriters who can’t live off ticket and T-shirt sales like the least sympathetic among us — and the people this reverse Robin Hooding benefits are rich service providers, whose swollen profits perfectly… [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm by Joshua Glazov
Their reply will probably sound something like this....Heed Judge Sam Crow's remarks in Adams v. [read post]