Search for: "People v Denis"
Results 421 - 440
of 15,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 3:37 pm
And then, at trial, the child denies that there was a tool, and then says he can't remember. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
” The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) subsequently denied his application because the Examining Attorney found the mark disparaging to people of Asian descent under Section 2(a). [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:51 am
In Labou v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:40 am
Miller v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:14 am
In Cole v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:57 am
In People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:42 pm
Bloch v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:56 pm
With respect to the merits of defendant's contention that a Frye hearing was required, it is well settled that expert testimony concerning CSAAS is admissible to assist the jury in understanding the unusual conduct of victims of child sexual abuse provided that, as here, the testimony is general in nature and does "not attempt to impermissibly prove that the charged crimes occurred" (People v Carroll, 95 NY2d 375, 387; see People v Gillard, 7 AD3d… [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
By denying a writ of certiorari in Hardeman v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 5:43 am
Last week the Fifth Circuit issued United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
The unanimous decision or the Appellate Division is People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:54 pm
People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
In a recent case, Goodman v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 3:35 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
North Coast Women's Care Medical Group [PDF file], that doctors of the North Coast Women's Care Medical Group cannot deny medical treatment to people based on their sexual orientation. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:53 pm
Limani v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:03 pm
Tomorrow, the California Supreme Court will release its decision in People v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:16 pm
People v Agostini, 2011 NY Slip Op 03752 (4th Dept. 2011) Great line from the Fourth Department “[d]efendant contends that he was denied a fair trial based on the prosecutor’s cross-examination of his wife concerning her prior employment as an exotic dancer. [read post]
