Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 6:41 am
This is particularly pertinent to the assessment of women, children and indigenous people as victims of eco-anxiety. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
In order to be able to stop other people using the idea (without asking the person who first had it) the idea must have been new, and must not have been too easy for other people (even people who knew a lot about the area of the idea) to have arrived at, at the time when we first asked to be allowed to stop other people from using it without asking. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:36 pm
The Lord Chancellor has said as much to the Joint Committee on Human Rights: “I am treating people differently because they are from this country and established in this country or they are not” (26 November 2013). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The older scheme placed people on the list if they were merely suspected of an offence, which the House of Lords rightly considered to be too harsh, despite the importance of protecting children. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
The appeal was considered by Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
The lord doesn't think he's a judge. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
(Fourth issue) The Supreme Court’s judgment Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Kitchin, with whom Lord Hodge agreed, gave the majority judgment, with Lord Carnwath dissenting in part. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
What about people, such as Ace Books, who had relied on the Lord of the Rings’ public domain status in the interim, before it was restored? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm
Hopefully this will be one of the many issues which Lord Justice Leveson will consider in the upcoming phone hacking inquiry. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
With its decision in King v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
Baroness Hale, with Lord Carnwath, found (at 77) Indeed, the respondent does not seriously dispute that Ms A needs to stay where she is. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
In the case of Mr Moore, the High Court found that the case involved the murder of two or more people, sexual or sadistic conduct and a substantial degree of premeditation and that there were no mitigating circumstances. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:53 am
One was set aside on appeal (Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The panel will be Lord Neuberger Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Tang v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
Lord Bach replied: “Yes”. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:20 pm
Today the Supremes handed down their ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
The bill presented by Ms Campbell’s lawyers at the end of the case was for over £1m, almost 60% of which related to the House of Lords appeal: Campbell v MGN Ltd (No 2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3488). [read post]
