Search for: "People v. Brady" Results 421 - 440 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
 The case concerned the breach of an undertaking given by the Sun in a case brought by Ian Brady’s executor. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Rule 8(b) and Rule 14; and 2) the government violated Brady, when it failed to produce arguably exculpatory evidence with respect to a charged co-conspirator until the week of trial. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am by Edward Hartnett
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am by Ben
Imagine if Russia doesn’t like what people are saying about Putin. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
As the Supreme Court noted in Heckler v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(IP Think Tank) Most people touting IP Strategy are selling snake oil – don’t believe them (IP Think Tank) IAM names the world’s leading IP strategists (IAM) Global – Trade Marks / Brands How to ‘verb up’ your brand naming (NameWire) Fifa scandal: the sponsors awaken (IPKat) Global – Patents Top NPE counsel Ray Niro attacks new Article One service (IAM) (IPBiz) Global – Copyright Final version of ACTA posted (Michael Geist) Goodbye Cathy:… [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bland, No. 06-3223 Conviction for bank robbery is affirmed where: 1) there was no Brady violation since evidence suppressed by the prosecution was not material to an issue at defendant's trial; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to conduct an independent in camera review of the evidence in question. [read post]