Search for: "People v. Bush" Results 421 - 440 of 2,169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Many people acknowledge that Reagan would not be nearly conservative enough for today’s Republican Party, yet the press cannot resist labeling as “moderates” conservative extremists like Susan Collins (who actually believes, among other things, that tax cuts pay for themselves—and who claimed to believe that Brett Kavanaugh would not overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:49 am
Someone should be ready to go on camera opening the report and trying to read the first page, right there in real time (the way reporters struggled with the final Bush v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bush had limited success in moving the Court to the right. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Bush’s victory in 2000, and it is happening now in the wake of Donald J. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and David Moosmann
Furthermore, in deciding the question of whether a bona fide emergency declaration has been made, the decision last spring in Trump v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Ryan Scoville
As indicated in Figure 4, there was a consistent equality of aptitude under the Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton administrations, when at [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:15 pm by Florian Mueller
Calabresi (Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law), a former Reagan and Bush 41 Administration official who used to clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia, believes it would be unconstitutional to proceed on the basis of ALJ Pender's ID. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
Bush’s torture program, Barr said he would uphold the 2015 McCain-Feinstein Torture Prohibition Amendment. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am by Jack Goldsmith
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]