Search for: "People v. Carter" Results 421 - 440 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
In 1984, Judge Robert Parker, a Carter appointee, was given 100% of the cases in Marshall and Paris. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
  He is being represented by Carter-Ruck whose press release can be found here. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I had an all-star roster of professors: Guido Calabresi, for torts; Stephen Carter, contracts; Owen Fiss, civil procedure; Rob Harrison, legal research; and Kate Stith, who taught my small-group course in constitutional law. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Michele Goodwin
Both justices were appointed in the same year to federal circuit courts of appeals in 1980 by President Jimmy Carter. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The ban covers visual surveillance equipment “produced by companies subject to the National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm by INFORRM
  The Council falsely alleged that she did not raise concerns about returning Baby Peter to his mother, Tracey Connelly, who was one of three people eventually convicted of causing or allowing his death. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
The well known media law firm Carter Ruck has agreed to represented freelance journalist Hardeep Singh on a CFA. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
Judge Carter determined that the emails contained possible evidence of criminal behavior. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:40 am
  And some of the smartest people I know are awful at chess. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 8:47 am
How much longer will the American people tolerate the destruction of cherished constitutional values? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 11:05 am by Yves Faguy
But the more likely scenario is that everybody will wait for the Supreme Court to hand down its ruling in Carter et al. v. [read post]