Search for: "People v. Cato" Results 421 - 440 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm by David Kopel
The states did not argue that the revisions to the Medicaid grant program violate the 4-factor test in S.D. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:25 am by Ilya Somin
Migration patterns in favor of economic freedom are even more stark when we look more broadly, and consider people who risk their lives fleeing socialist or communist states such as Cuba.For reasons I discuss in this new article, and Part V of this older one, people often make better-informed decisions when they vote with their feet than at the ballot box (where economic liberty is, of course, much less popular). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:51 am by Kali Borkoski
Wednesday’s argument in Snyder v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Because it allows people to -gasp- criticize people like them aloud. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:20 pm by Walter Olson
There’s also this clip on the Cato site. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
But as the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
While the Justice Department has had its share of success stories and Walter Olson's blog post at Cato@Liberty lists a few large monetary r [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:42 am by Erin Miller
Arizona in light of the Court’s recent decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew Scarola
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:13 pm by Berin Szoka
The former is essentially what happens when regulatory fantasies meet the real world of lobbyists and the limits and incentives inherent in any bureaucracy, as Tim Lee explained in his classic 2008 Cato paper The Durable Internet: Preserving Network Neutrality without Regulation. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:09 pm by Walter Olson
Third Circuit drop-kicks “spygate” football-fan class action against New England Patriots [Cal Civil Justice, Russell Jackson, earlier] “Watch Those ‘Jury Duty’ Tweets, People” [Lowering the Bar] Ninth Circuit Kozinski-O’Connor-Ikuta panel rules for free speech in big “hostile environment” workplace-discrimination case [Volokh first, second and third posts; Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:11 pm by Jeff Gamso
 The details don't really matter here.What got me rolling on this, are Rand Paul's comments on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Volokh Conspirator David Bernstein's response/attack to "Bruce Bartlett's Attack on Libertarianism," and David Rittger's piece at the Cato@Liberty blog warning that US v. [read post]