Search for: "People v. Herring"
Results 421 - 440
of 23,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
Decision The decision begins with a detailed analysis of ECHR, art 8 and the “two fundamental values” that it protects as identified by Baroness Hale of Richmond in R (Countryside Alliance) v Attorney General [2007] UKHL 52, para 116, namely: “the inviolability of the home and personal communications from official snooping, entry and interference without a very good reason”; and “the inviolability of … the personal and psychological space within which… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
When he stopped to help her, Emma did not appear to know where she was going... [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:07 pm
So not really a classic carjacking when you shove a gun in the driver's face and throw her from the vehicle. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:48 am
People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
For crossing an intersection when the "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing.Yet, notwithstanding the incredibly tiny monetary interest at stake, the opinion may well have more practical significance to most of us than nearly every single one of the other appellate opinions we read.Pamela Monk got her $25 ticket because a police officer saw her enter the crosswalk when the red "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing, and was in it's "countdown"… [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:33 am
He had Telitha take him to the Amtrak station because he did not want the people following him to find her or his wife. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:14 am
After Jones parked the car, Torres paid Jones $60 to have intercourse with her and for her to orally copulate him. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:50 pm
At age 14, she was using methamphetamines and LSD daily, and her use continued until recently. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
See People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 3:46 pm
Because people who (in situations like this) are not the actual shooter can file a petition to be potentially resentenced.So Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:21 pm
I mean, sure, we want to stop crazy homeless people from going into houses that aren't *actually* theirs and drinking juice boxes and the like. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:07 am
Case citation: Illoominate Media, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
I've said some good things recently about good opinions and good people. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
The district court said it felt bound to dismiss her claims because of a 1979 Supreme Court case, Smith v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
Case citations: Davison v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:02 am
Maybe she's eating stuff in the trash can because she's really hungry and they won't give her the food she wants.Which the Court of Appeal (and the medical staff) notes is a possibility. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:21 pm
Often a justice will save his or her best written work for published opinions. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
”Or, when talking to her attorney:“If [defense counsel] proves to me that I’m doing it wrong by getting the judges down the street to tell me I’m wrong, again, I’ll be happy to reconsider it. [read post]
