Search for: "People v. London" Results 421 - 440 of 1,916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm
The state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Jan. 18 in the case of State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am by Frank Cranmer
People can indicate they would like to renounce their honour, as Ms Vennells has now done – but doing so has no formal effect. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am by Adam Wagner
The court was of the view that, clearly, it is a matter of significant wider public interest to understand why someone such as the claimant’s late husband “who was born in Dewsbury, Yorkshire and led his life in the United Kingdom should have decided to participate in the murder of a large number of innocent people in London”. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by S S
In both types of cases, the social landlord is pursuing proceedings in order to recover property that might be used to provide accommodation for other homeless people. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am by Robert Brammer
The WSPU later moved to London in 1906 in order to lobby Parliament more effectively. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:25 am by Ilya Somin
Migration patterns in favor of economic freedom are even more stark when we look more broadly, and consider people who risk their lives fleeing socialist or communist states such as Cuba.For reasons I discuss in this new article, and Part V of this older one, people often make better-informed decisions when they vote with their feet than at the ballot box (where economic liberty is, of course, much less popular). [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Hamlets v Al Ahmed (2019) EWHC 749 (QB) Mr Ahmed had applied to Tower Hamlets (oddly named as ‘Hamlets’ in the reported judgment) as homeless. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
On ii), M submitted that the decision was unlawful, on the basis of R (S) v London Borough of Sutton [2007] EWHC 1196 (Admin) and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham [2008] 1 WLR. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Here Brandsmiths' Andrew Lee pens a guest post on the dissemination of misinformation, or at least over-generalised information, to a wide audience of people who may not realise its true import. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:38 am by Ilya Somin
In the notorious condemnation project upheld by the Supreme Court in the famous case Kelo v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
In Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 Lewison LJ referred to Neutrogena [1996] R.P.C. 473 that:"...There is passing off even if most of the people are not fooled most of the time but enough are for enough of the time. [read post]