Search for: "People v. Martin" Results 421 - 440 of 1,808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2019, 9:41 am by CJLF Staff
More on The Boise Case:  A piece by Anchorage attorney Lee Baxter in the Alaska Landmine, discusses at length the petition by Boise, Idaho to have SCOTUS review the Ninth Circuit's 2018 Martin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Amy Howe has this blog’s main report of the argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Eric Fick, the program executive officer for the F-35 Lightning II joint program office; Diana Maurer, the director of the defense capabilities and management team at the Government Accountability Office; Gregory Ulmer, the vice president and general manager of the F-35 program at Lockheed Martin; and Matthew Bromberg, the president of the military engines program at Pratt & Whitney. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:08 am by Chris Castle
 (The case is cited as Eight Mile Style, LLC and Martin Affiliated, LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Some of those very people, however, said Esposito’s claims are greatly embellished, or simply not true. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
The much anticipated judgment of Kogan v Martin [2019] EWCA Civ 1645 was recently handed down by the Court of Appeal (CA) which revisits the thorny issue of joint authorship of copyright works. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 12:54 pm by Rui Dias
Simon Taylor (University of Paris Nanterre) ensued directing the discussion to the private enforcement of the GDPR, giving note of some recent case law in the UK on non-pecuniary losses (one of which from the day previous to the Conference, Lloyd v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
That same day, I met Martine Roy for the first time. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am by becassidy
Martin – Can cities restrict homeless people from camping or sleeping on sidewalks or in public places? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Hodges—where the state was denying demographic class of people the ability to marry. [read post]