Search for: "People v. Nations"
Results 421 - 440
of 18,503
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
The case is Hanson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 11:12 am
See People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
To become effective, directives must first be transposed into national law. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
In Morgan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Madison’s “otherwise provided for” caveat was approved on June 1, and it was included in the report of the Committee of the Whole on June 13 in the following form: Resolved, That a national executive be instituted, to consist of a single person; to be chosen by the national legislature, for the term of seven years; with the power to carry into execution the national laws, to appoint to offices in cases not otherwise provided for—to be… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:49 am
Michael Brennan discussing Biden v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 8:34 am
I have blogged before about the unfortunate reality that even 60 years after Gigeon v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am
Quick links Anna Bond, Lexology: Professor’s ‘anti-Zionist’ beliefs were protected: on Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022: we noted the case here. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane and John Taylor’s response to McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
His disappointments grounded not in the annoyance of ideological systems producing good for the common people; it is rather the reverse, the sense of betrayal around an ideology the greatest success of which was its text. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
Note: Compare with Dick Heller of Heller v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:39 am
Exclusionary zoning is permitted under Euclid v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Nationally, 1924 marked the debut of race-based national origins quotas as a technique of systematic immigration restriction as well as the return of the Ku Klux Klan to national political prominence. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:11 pm
(As much as I respect Justice Scalia's vote in Texas v. [read post]