Search for: "People v. Nixon"
Results 421 - 440
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
” They convinced voters that the death penalty was needed to punish people like “Richard ‘The Night Stalker’ Ramirez [who] kidnapped, raped, tortured and mutilated 14 people and terrorized 11 more including children and senior citizens. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
Since we don't have Richard Nixon to kick around anymore, I'll talk about Ann Coulter instead. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Our Constitution calls for an ongoing and perpetual government unless modified under the amendment process set forth in Article V of the Constitution or by revolution. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am
But really, the most important feature here is that the police are conducting covert searches of people's homes. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
As the appointees of Presidents Nixon, Reagan and George H.W. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm
Big majorities of the Court have been wrong before (obvious examples: Plessy v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Katz v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
Supreme Court ruling in Katz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:30 pm
D/1; and, Nixon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
Nixon was the great advocate for legal services. 10:47 Changes in legal services could help. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
Whitman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:30 am
This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.The ERA continued to be introduced to every subsequent congress after its failure in 1923, until 1972, when the amendment was passed in the House, Senate, and was signed by President Richard Nixon. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Mager v. [read post]
