Search for: "People v. Perry" Results 421 - 440 of 786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am by William Carleton
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
Inforrm has an article on the recent decision by Twitter to ban posting images of people without their consent. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:54 am by Jeff Gamso
(Say, advocating for a public option in health care - somethat that all the polls indicate most people favor.) [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:24 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: "Sorkin to graduates: you're 'incredibly well-educated dumb people'" pjblack.me/LdVuJD "Lady Comics: Who Needs Late Night? [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
 The judge acknowledged that in general the people of a state can amend their constitution, even taking away rights, but he went on to suggest that this power is limited by Romer, and one question in Perry is whether that limit applies in this context. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:35 am by Deborah Hellman
  The plaintiffs in Perry argued that Proposition 8 violated their fundamental right to marry, citing Loving v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That's inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the one Supreme Court case that construes Section 4, Perry v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If a system runs fast, people probably aren't getting effective representation; too slow and people sit in jail. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[13]And it is in no small part thanks to this work of repudiation that more people on the left as well as on the right now recognize the hollowness of liberalism’s pretensions to neutrality. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
By Mike Dorf Last week I expressed skepticism about the validity of the distinction between failure-to-give and taking-away that Judge Reinhardt's opinion draws in Perry v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]