Search for: "People v. Powell"
Results 421 - 440
of 705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm
Oklahoma Bar Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:07 am
Justice Ginsburg, quoting Professor Thomas Reed Powell, in today's opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:14 am
But in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
The White Paper (correctly) invoked the Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Unlike Powell, this required a factual determination.The Defendant was entitled to, at least, know the d the dates and substance of allegations against him. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Unlike Powell, this required a factual determination.The Defendant was entitled to, at least, know the d the dates and substance of allegations against him. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 7:39 am
Most people familiar with the Court's progression from Bowers v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am
” (372 U.S. 335, 342-43 (1963), quoting Powell v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:40 pm
In Sony v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
The Court failed timely to appoint counsel in Powell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
Doyle v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
AriLaakkonen (Powell Gilbert), moderator of the second part of the panel, began with a question and the first of many analogies. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court overturned the convictions in Powell v Alabama (1932) for the first time ruling that defendants were entitled to an effective lawyer. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
The landmark ruling in Gideon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
The case of Cobb and Powell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
What the original draftsmen (that is, the people who actually wrote the words) subjectively intended might be evidence of what the words meant at the time, but any divergence between the drafters’ subjective intentions and the most likely understandings of those words at the time of enactment would be resolved in favor of the latter. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
UK (2008) 47 EHRR 40, a lot of people (around these parts) have been waiting for a case on Article 8 and the rule in Hammersmith v Monk (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v. [read post]
