Search for: "People v. Wells"
Results 421 - 440
of 30,309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2008, 12:56 pm
Oh well. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
" But Professor Amar's lecture makes a much broader point as well, one that has resonance for future election disputes well beyond debate over the legacy of Bush v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
If free speech is for people, and corporations aren't people, then is there an element of hypocrisy in supporting a lawsuit by a corporation asserting its right to use its wealth and power with respect to a contentious political issue? [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
Such a legislator might also believe that while a guard who mistakenly has consensual contact with an inmate is generally unlikely to commit other sex crimes once caught and punished, an inmate who's so desperate for sex that he's willing to violate the sex rules while in prison might not only engage in similar conduct once released, but other sex-related statutes as well; e.g., sex with minors, with relatives, with unconsenting people, etc. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:34 am
Not because people don't illegally fish there. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 2:35 pm
Walser was in the car as well. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:51 pm
Reasonable minds might well disagree as to both (1) how much of a concern suffices to create an exception to the warrant requirement, as well as (2) whether that standard, whatever it is, was satisfied here.But at least for me, I think that the circumstances here were sufficiently unusual -- and in a way that I could easily imagine would result in a person in distress being in the home -- to create at least a non-trivial (i.e., real) risk that the officers would enter… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm
No blood, no foul.But Justice Liu has a point as well. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:04 pm
You would work with me directly, as well as with a small, supportive, friendly, fun, talented, and non-hierarchical group of colleagues. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 9:37 am
” Jessica suffered additional fractures to her skull, four ribs, sternum, and lower spinal disk, as well as internal bleeding. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
And, if it were me, I suspect that, as a factfinder, I might well find that Mr. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
I thought that was the province of places like . . . well, I won't mention any particular state. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Wells v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:04 pm
In People v Forbes (2010 NY Slip Op 02349 [4th Dept 3/19/10] the Appellate Division, Fourth Department found that there was a violation of the well settled requirement that "police officers need either a warrant or probable cause plus exigent circumstances in order to make a lawful entry into a home" (Kirk v Louisiana, 536 US 635, 638; see Payton v New York, 445 US 573, 589-590):Where, as here, the People contend that a suspect gave… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:27 pm
And it it’s very difficult for the Court to say, oh, well, we—we know better. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm
Although the Court in R. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:04 am
While the Supreme Court was deciding issues of standing, a good number of people wondered: "who needs standing when you have reexamination? [read post]
