Search for: "People v. Winning"
Results 421 - 440
of 7,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2023, 5:10 pm
I asked the UCLA Emmett Institute’s Distinguished Counsel Mary Nichols to share her thoughts after reading the decision in Held v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
At the same time, the trademark owner got its desired result because the advertiser removed the trademark from its ad copy, so the trademark owner could claim this lawsuit as a net win. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:17 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:47 am
That indeed proved to be the winning issue for Baldwin. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:40 am
See also Doe 1 v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
That may be OK for the winning party so long as the winning party remains the winning party when the post-trial work ends. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:55 am
Which means Held v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:52 am
In Held v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
appeared first on Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:53 am
I think these could be winning arguments, at least in the D.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
People with felony convictions are not eligible to serve. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
In June, Sierra Leone’s incumbent president was re-elected, winning just enough votes to avoid a runoff, but election observers were alarmed by statistical inconsistencies in the announced results. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
” It did so by overturning Roe v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:28 pm
Last night was proof that when the people mobilize and organize to defend our essential liberties, we all win. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
And his emails to Eastman and Giuliani subsequently first proposed a Senate hearing “with at least two highly qualified legal scholars concluding that the President of the Senate is solely responsible for counting the votes, and that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional in dictating limits on debate and dictating who wins electoral votes when [read post]
