Search for: "Perez v. Chang"
Results 421 - 440
of 508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
No (as of April 2017), but this could change. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
No (as of April 2017), but this could change. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
Greaves v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm
Judulang contends that the BIA’s change in practice in 2005, which the en banc Ninth Circuit followed in Abebe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
New Jersey Perez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Perez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
Games-Perez. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Perez in 1824. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
In Perez v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:15 am
The Duty to Respond to Public Comments In Perez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Medina v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Perez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:26 pm
Perez, permanently enjoins DOL from implementing the Persuader Rule nationwide. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:54 pm
What's prompting the changes? [read post]