Search for: "Petition of Reed"
Results 421 - 440
of 609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
The substance of the amended petition reflects that MCD does not seek to enforce the Development Agreement in conjunction with its breach of fiduciary duty claim. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
In 1992, Espinosa filed a bankruptcy petition under Chapter 13. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
Supreme Court.Criminal law -- Prohibition -- Emergency petition seeking to prohibit circuit court from proceeding to trial until supreme court determines proper procedure for deciding immunity from prosecution under “Stand Your Ground Law” -- In view of supreme court's recent decision resolving conflict on this issue and rejecting district court's prior position, petition granted and trial court directed to follow the approved procedureJULIO CRUZ, Appellant,… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
Hedgepeth is a pro se prisoner petition for habeas corpus. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:47 am
Weeks have gone by and the bankruptcy attorney has not filed your petition with the court. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:10 am
Flynn in Support of Debtors' Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Motions Filed By Summit Business Media Holding CompanyMotion of Debtors for Interim and Final Orders (I) Authorizing Post-Petition Secured Financing Pursuant to Sections 105, 361, 362, 364(c)(1), 364(c)(2), 364(d)(1), 364(e) and 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; (II) Authorizing the Debtors to Use Cash Collateral; (III) Providing Adequate Protection to the Existing First Lien Secured Parties and Existing Second Lien… [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Reed (U.S. 2010) (upholding mandatory disclosure of signatories of referendum petition challenging law expanding rights of same-sex domestic partners) are cases in which gay rights and the First Amendment intersect and in which the Supreme Court is finally confronting the changed technology of the media. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm
Reed, the Court rejected a challenge to Washington State’s Public Records Act by opponents of Washington’s domestic-partnership law who wanted to keep private their signatures on a referendum petition. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:57 pm
On May 19, 2008, Colony Cove Properties, LLC (“Colony Cove”), which planned to convert a mobile home park in Carson from rental to resident ownership, filed a verified writ of petition seeking a writ of mandate directing Carson to vacate the Survey Ordinance. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:48 am
Reed, Chief Justice Roberts said that releasing the names promoted transparency and accountability in the electoral process and allowed authentication of signatures. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:38 am
Reed Mercado (213) 617-5410 rmercado@sheppardmullin.com [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:38 am
Reed Mercado (213) 617-5410 rmercado@sheppardmullin.com [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Reed, the Court found that disclosure of the identities of petition signers did not, absent a particularized showing, so chill their petition signing as to violate their free speech rights; and in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:17 am
You can access a full copy of Reed v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
Reed. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:11 am
Reed, 09-559 (U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:29 am
Reed, No. 09-559 (June 24, 2010) in an 8 to 1 opinion holding that disclosure of referendum petitions containing the names and addresses of signers generally does not impermissibly burden free speech: “We conclude that such disclosure does not as a general matter violate the First Amendment, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm
The most recent round of criticism of Elena Kagan involves her claimed role in the medical debate over the procedure known as Intact D&X, which pro-life advocates refer to as partial-birth abortion. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:08 am
Three of the defendants were weeks away from the deadline to file postconviction petitions. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:29 pm
Reed Disclosure of the identity of persons who sign petitions for ballot referenda does not normally violate the First Amendment. [read post]
