Search for: "Phillips v. No Defendants Named"
Results 421 - 440
of 539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:01 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
Defendants relied on Abernathy & Closther, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 5:23 am
This was a typo, the true anonymised case name was BCD v EFG and the de-anonymised name is Donald v Ntuli (b) P v E? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:02 am
Phillips v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Manefield v Child Care NSW ([2010] NSWSC 1420) a former childcare executive whose name was blackened by an association trying to stifle competition was awarded Aus$150,000 There is a news story about the case in the Sydney Morning Herald. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:01 am
(b) P v E? [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
That last point, the runaway jury awarding punitive damages on its own volition, particularly troubles us, because in Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
For an elaborate account of the law, interested readers may refer to Chitty on Contracts (30th edition, ¶ 26-010 onwards), McGregor on Damages (18th edition, Chapter 13), and the leading decisions in Astley v Weldon, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v New Garage (especially Lord Dunedin) and Phillips v AG of Hong Kong, (1993) 61 BLR 41. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am
Supreme court changes fair comment defence in libel cases Guardian: Lord Phillips says that key test for defending libel cases should be changed to ‘honest comment’ in light of new technology Spiller and another (Appellants) v Joseph and others (Respondents) [2010] UKSC 53 On appeal from the Court of Appeal [2009] EWCA Civ 1075 JUSTICES: Lord Phillips (President), Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown and Sir John Dyson SCJ JUDGMENT The Supreme Court… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
PHILLIPS, District Judge.This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8]. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:45 pm
Phillip M. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Related: Diane Phillips, individually and on behalf of the wrongful death benefitiaries of Merle Fall, deceased v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am
This would seem to be consistent, at least on a political level, with the Administration's prior call for DADT to be repealed by Congress.Nevertheless, President Obama seems to have ordered his Justice Department to seek a stay on implementation of Judge Phillips' order in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Lord Phillips MR, giving the judgment of the Court stated:- “We wish, however, to make some brief observations about [Lord Woolf CJ’s guidance in A v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:07 am
On the return date, the Defendant did not oppose the continuation of the injunction. [read post]
