Search for: "Phillips v. Weeks" Results 421 - 440 of 885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is well settled that “[a] cause of action for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed” (Elstein v Phillips Lytle, LLP, 108 AD3d 1073, 1073 [4th Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]), and that, “[w]hat is important [in determining the accrual date] is when the malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it” (Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 95 [1982]; see Town of Amherst v Weiss, 120 AD3d 1550,… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by Marissa Miller
Shawn Turner at Hotel News Now previews RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
Kentucky and oral argument in Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Phillips, 12-544; Chappell’s Doublemint twin, Phillips v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Non-Compete and Trade Secrets News for the week ended January 6, 2017***Commercial real estate broker Avison Young has sued three former brokers who joined Cushman & Wakefield. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:42 am by Ben
"  The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Grogan and Jeannine McSweeney, and Associate Jake Phillips of the Simpson Thacher law firm take a look at key issues employers should consider when contemplating compensation reductions for employees and non-employee directors during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
16 May 2010, 6:25 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 47075 (ED PA, May 12, 2010), a Pennsylvania federal district court rejected a Black Jewish inmate's claims that his right to religious expression was violated when officials took time to investigate his religious needs in the first two weeks of his commitment, and when they thereafter failed to provide enough menu variety and consistent food preparation.In Phillips v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am by cdw
” In two separate cases, Roy Phillip Ballard v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Dean Gonsowski
Edgewood Properties Inc., 257 F.R.D. 418 (D.N.J. 2009) and Phillip M. [read post]