Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth" Results 421 - 440 of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Gordon D. Todd
Surrounded by 5-4 nail-biters, the 3-3-3 split generated by Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by G.A. Napier
However, in a recent as yet unpublished case from the Court of Appeals for Kentucky, K.H. v Cabinet, issued on December 22, 2011, the Cabinet has run into a limit on their power. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Benkharbouche v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs, heard 6-8 Jun 2017. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:52 am by Mark Ashton
Much of the new statutory law is not different than what has evolved as judicially written law since the 1990 case, Gruber v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Moving to dismiss, the defendant, relying on its status as an arm of the Commonwealth, argued that the action was barred by the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
In the Commonwealth's view, Augustine had no standing to defend information that he did not possess, and which he supposedly willingly turned over to his cell phone company. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:25 am by Monica Shah
  The SJC affirmed this reading of Rule 12 in its decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:23 am by Blog Editorial
The UK Government is the defendant in the matter and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office legal branch represents the interests of Her Majesty’s Government. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:03 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
The promoters of the Washington conclave recognized that it would not have Article V powers, but they hoped that if it did reach agreement, the political pressure on Congress would be sufficient to induce it to respond in kind. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:34 pm
Yesterday the High Court of Australia upheld a new government law that requires that cigarettes be sold in olive-green packets with graphic images of the consequences of smoking: JT International SA and British American Tobacco Australasia Limited v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] HCA 30. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court provision had rejected in its 2013 decision American Express v. [read post]