Search for: "Powers v. Jones"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
O’Daniel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
(relisted after the June 20 conference) GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Sales. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am
Bobby Chesney discussed Justice Stephen Breyer’s analysis of the denial of cert in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:35 pm
Section 101 is one the most powerful tools patent law provides for defending against patents that never should have been issued in the first place. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Jones that filing a civil suit would not. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 10:16 am
E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Scripps NP Operating dba The Corpus Christi Caller-Times v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Background The appeal in R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors [2019] UKSC 22, concerned primarily the issue of whether the High Court has jurisdiction to judicially review decisions of the IPT, despite the apparent exclusion of such jurisdiction by way of section 67(8) of RIPA. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2019] UKSC 22), deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”) that purports to exclude from challenge or appeal any decision of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (“IPT”), does not… [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Jones sets up the question, but neither Jones nor the relevant history provides much in the way of answers.17 The Court subsequently applied Jones in Florida v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 11:41 am
Nor did Franklin v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am
Cadence Bank v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:15 pm
Jones, 789 S. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Bull v Desporte, heard 25 to 28 March 2019 (Julian Knowles J) Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
