Search for: "Price v. District of Columbia" Results 421 - 440 of 500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
According to a complaint filed simultaneously with the settlement in federal court in the District of Columbia, between 1998 and 2006, Cummins shipped more than 570,000 heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers nationwide without pollution control equipment included, in violation of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Unlike the Liquor Control Board, which sends undercover agents to the District of Columbia (where alcohol is much less expensive principally because of lower taxes) to look for vehicles with Pennsylvania license tags outside retail liquor establishments, and who then call ahead to officers "waiting at the border," the use tax division doesn't seem to care. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
I'm sure the district attorney's office is burning the midnight oil to find some daylight in Arizona v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
District Judge Jose Martinez sent pieces of the permit review back to the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:34 am
State Street Corporation (PDF 4.5 MB)Lawsuit Alleges Fraud Against Two California State Pension Funds10/20/2009 Criminal Complaint in the Matter of U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 8:00 am
On August 3, 2009, a District of Columbia federal judge dismissed a shareholder derivative suit alleging that ePlus Inc. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
  These small, short-term, high-rate loans by check cashers, finance companies and others all come at a very high price for consumers. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
It's hard to get an injunction enforcing a covenant not to compete that has a nationwide territory, but the Plaintiff was successful at that in the Middle District's decision last week in Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 8:21 am
Energy Prices The Court also granted two cases involving regulated energy prices: State of Texas v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:15 am
District Court of the District of Columbia transgender Title VII case: $491,190.80; Schroer v. [read post]