Search for: "Price v. State Bar"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Guest Post: Halliburton II Price Impact Defenses Can Limit Severity on Deficient Exchange Act Claims
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm
Rather, the real winner is a growing cohort of lawyers who are filing meritless lawsuits in federal and state courts across the United States every time a merger or acquisition is announced or a corporate misfortune impacts a company’s share price… In the last five years, half of the nearly $23 billion in securities claims costs have gone to lawyers — both plaintiff and defense.[4] Since 2017, the plaintiffs’ bar has expanded their… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
The upshot of the three cases — Centro Empresarial v America Movil, Arfa v Zamir, and Pappas v Tzolis — is that it depends not only on the particular language of the waiver or release but also on the sophistication of the complaining party and whether, at the time of the transaction, the complaining party had reason to distrust the other party such that it could not reasonably rely on the latter’s representations. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm
United States 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
FERC, for instance, could adopt policies facilitating greater deployment of low-carbon power sources and accommodating the adoption of state-level carbon pricing. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 pm
March 13 – Declaration of National Emergency The President declared a national state of emergency under the Stafford Act for all U.S. states, territories and possessions. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
Well, pretty bad if you don't like spending 201 months behind bars, according to Florida's Second District Court of Appeal. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:39 pm
The most recent, CM Callow Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:35 am
That left only the state Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
That is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:30 am
United States (2019). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:00 am
Vanni cites the Indian Supreme Court's decision in Novartis v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm
UgandaHuman Rights Network Uganda v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
As demand for fuel dropped, so did oil prices. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 1:27 pm
And it said that an injunction barring enforcement of ACA provisions should apply only in the states that sued to challenge the law. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Fraser v. [read post]
