Search for: "Public Citizen v. Kennedy" Results 421 - 440 of 920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by Mark Walsh
Kennedy filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, which Justice Alito joined. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Meanwhile, Justice Stevens was in Washington, D.C., for a conversation hosted by Alliance for Justice and George Washington University, where he criticized the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
Menachem’s parents are American citizens, and Menachem was born in Jerusalem. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Last week, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 pm by Ken White
S. 105, 127 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment)–including obscenity, Roth v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am by Ilya Shapiro
” In effect, Kennedy doubled down on his own rationale in Citizens United. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm by Joseph Grodin
Thirteen years ago this tension came before the Court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Gavin Newsom of California, who is in the public gallery as he was two years ago for Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am by Michael Klarman
Sophisticated models of public opinion predict that in less than a decade, even in Mississippi a majority of citizens will favor same-sex marriage. * * * * * Three lessons emerge from this brief history of same-sex marriage litigation in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
The states’ briefs on the marriage question Michigan, a state that last year persuaded the Supreme Court to leave it to the state’s voters to choose to ban the use of race in public university admissions (Schuette v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm by Corey Brettschneider
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
There, Justice Kennedy, among others, noted the “serious constitutional problem” that would result if a federal statute were interpreted as threatening the citizens of a State with significant injury unless the State agreed to follow federal policies. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm by Jag
If a citizen’s activities are lawful, they should be free from the state keeping a record of them unless, and then only for as long as, such a record really needs to be kept in the public interest. [read post]