Search for: "Queen v State"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2019, 12:25 am
This was the question tackled by the Kluwer Patent Blog, which takes a look at emerging forensics methods in the PRC, which aim to make the process of collecting evidence in China slightly easier and more cost efficient.Right to be forgottenIPWatchdog looks at the global implications of Google v CNIL, which addressed requests for de-referencing (or 'the right to be forgotten'), with the case ultimately ruling that de-referencing only need be carried out on versions of the… [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm
… The Government announced as part of the Queen’s Speech [on 14 October 2019] that we will publish draft legislation for pre-legislative scrutiny. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:23 am
Henry v Foxco sets out the elements to consider when determining if an employer has just cause to dismiss. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
From Hornback v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 1:35 pm
Lanzillo in Peschmann v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am
We could only resist the attacks of the state. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
United States Talks of a federal privacy law continue in the United States, the New York Times reports. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Bush v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
– Daren Heyland, MD Professor of Medicine Queen’s University __________________ References [i] https://www.cihi.ca/en/hospital-stays-in-canada ; last accessed September 19, 2019. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
A small handful of cases involving judicial review have ensured the CICB continued to achieve the goals stated in the Act in a reasonable manner. [read post]
