Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
Walk & Robert V. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
Under Roberts’s logic, any new Commerce Department explanation hammered together in July 2019 would inevitably appear pretextual when offered to explain a March 2018 census design decision. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
[The Structure of NFIB v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:36 am
V. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a majority in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
The census citizenship question case (New York et al. v Dep't of Commerce, back in the SDNY after remand from the Supreme Court in June) has taken a strange new turn. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Simon LazarusNo less than the Trump administration, Supreme Court pundits felt blind-sided by Chief Justice John Roberts’ rejection, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Responding to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling last week in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Texas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:24 am
If the majority in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:49 am
In a long-awaited decision, Iancu v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 7:30 am
Clearly, this was done to satisfy the secondary rationale of Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
In an earlier post, Josh noted that Texas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
Sebelius, by construing the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act as a tax in order to avoid the constitutional issues posed by treating it as an exercise of the commerce power.1 The Court also invoked the canon in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
Justice Gorsuch wrote a blistering dissent, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
[Understanding NFIB v. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 7:30 pm
” This year’s term ended with the same man stating in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am
Hadley Baker shared appellate briefs from both parties in Trump v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:43 am
This is because the "penalty" no longer fits the definition of a tax articulated by Chief Justice Roberts in NFIB v. [read post]
