Search for: "RODNEY KING"
Results 421 - 430
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2007, 9:20 am
El video es de encyclomediaY dice el artÃculo de La Ley Actualidad, que firma hoy Ricardo Cavallero, a favor del Jucio por Jurados:En fin, en lo sucesivo el acto de adjudicación jurisdiccional en lo penal tendrá un indudable efecto pacificador, porque resultará consensuado y refrendado por toda la sociedad.Links y +:- Disturbios de Los Angeles en 1992 (Wikipedia)+ Un conductor negro, Rodney King, habÃa sido detenido,… [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:08 am
(Via Memeoradum.)...16 years [ago] Los Angeles police officers beating Rodney King were filmed by amateur videographer George Holliday on the night of March 3, 1991. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:30 am
"
"AP says that he heroic way police handled the incident gave a morale boost to the Los Angeles Police Department, which was struggling to rebound after the 1991 Rodney King beating and subsequent race riot. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 11:59 pm
Public Defender Investigator Greg Worthen, who will be hosting our Blawg Review #91 on Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
Then, in 1991, George Holliday was trying out his new video camera when he saw police officers clubbing Rodney King. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 10:30 am
Some worry that YouTube's ability to disseminate images of police brutality rapidly will stimulate more Rodney King-style urban unrest. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
While a person acquitted in State court can still be prosecuted and convicted in Federal court (remember the trials of the L.A. police officers caught on videotape beating Rodney King), it rarely occurs. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 11:06 am
Heck, his next column should cite Rodney King. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 9:31 pm
YouTube was recently sued for copyright infringement, on the ground that it hosted the notorious video depicting the beating of Reginald Denny in Los Angeles after the (almost incomprehensible) verdict in the state-court case against Rodney King's attackers. [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 11:16 am
The defendant was not allowed to have anyone at the trial to view it ("state secrets"), and the defense was denied the right to call a witness on his behalf.I have previously considered the manner in which prosecutor and police groups in this country want to "speed up" justice in this country, and take away more and more rights of defendants here (unless, of course, those defendants happen to be right wingers, in which case they truly are innocent, and shouldn't even be… [read post]
