Search for: "Range v. Range"
Results 421 - 440
of 20,088
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 12:30 am
This requirement has now been explicitly called out in the guidelines: "Occasionally applications are filed in which there is a fundamental insufficiency in the invention in the sense that it cannot be carried out by a person skilled in the art [...] another example can be found in the field of artificial intelligence if the mathematical methods and the training datasets are disclosed in insufficient detail to reproduce the technical effect over the whole range claimed. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:41 am
Punishments for householder permitting sexual activity under 18 charges range from 1 year of imprisonment to 14 years of imprisonment. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:18 am
Carovillano v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm
The top posts over this period have been from a number of authors – taking a range of different views on the issues. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
” Rhode v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
[1] Moody, et al., v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:46 pm
Defendants appealed arguing that the future pain and suffering award was excessive; however, in Vasquez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
Lash at several junctures treats evidence of the drafters' (believed) purposes, motivations, or immediate desired political consequences as if they necessarily constitute limitations on the range of the text's original linguistic meaning. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Juliana v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Larue v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
Instead, in Harris v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:58 pm
(There were a lot of back-and-forth postings about the Bush v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
