Search for: "Read v. People"
Results 421 - 440
of 21,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2020, 5:06 pm
Even without reading the Ninth Circuit stuff, reading the California opinions -- which total well over three hundred pages today -- took the majority of my working day. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm
Yet, at times, I honestly lost track of where Justice Margulies was going as I read the opinion. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 3:46 pm
Simply reading the transcript doesn't enable a judge to decide who's telling the truth, or which side is right. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
You read all these Senate Bill 1437 opinions these days; it's a fair amount of work for both trial courts and the Courts of Appeal. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 1:13 pm
We're using this term in a broader sense.But even after reading the entire opinion a couple of times, I'm still not at all sure of the dividing line between "unconscious" and "insane" under the Court of Appeal's approach.I get that when you're sleepwalking, you're "unconscious" even though you might be moving and appear to have voluntary control. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
"As I read that, I wondered which casino the opinion was talking about. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 4:54 pm
Some people have problems. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
When I first read this opinion, I thought: "Duh. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
The online English-language article was, however, read by at least 200 people in Canada. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Or at least that's the thought you're left with after reading the opinion, since there's nothing in there at all to suggest a contrary principle.This is disappointing for two reasons. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:54 am
In the meanwhile, however, I am, with Russell's permission, appending his article so that other people, who otherwise would have no reason to know that his article exists, can read his description of what has been going on in Cambridge. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
And I hope both that Detective Serrata does not hear the end of this one, as well as that the other people involved in this controversy know they did the right thing and would do it again. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 6:15 am
Supreme Court in the case of Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
Berger v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:11 pm
Well, I’ve finished reading the Florida Supreme Court opinion in State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 2:55 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Presser v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:53 pm
Continue reading The post Mitchell v. [read post]
