Search for: "Reagan v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 1,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
But the Reagan administration reversed course, keeping the United States on a fossil fuel-dependent path that continued even as the scientific community’s warnings became ever more urgent. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:20 am
The relevant distinction would presumably be congressionalists v. presidentialists, and I wonder how many of the Balkinization regulars are truly happy with the status quo. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
” Judge Watson’s analysis reminds me of a colloquy in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Ben
 Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
With Monday’s filing of the reply briefs by the government and the intervenors, the briefing in the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
(The Violence Against Women Act of 1994, for example, was ruled in part unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
 If the Judiciary Act of 1789 and related legislation better explain the establishment and development of judicial review in the United States than Marbury v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Constitution guaranteed that every state would have two Senators regardless of population, and immunized the states’ equal representation in the Senate from the ordinary process of amendment in Article V, requiring each state to consent to changing its equal representation in the Senate. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
”  Tushnet means to survey the possibilities for constitutional law as the Reagan regime is ending in political time. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:20 am by admin
Though the Carter administration signed CEDAW in 1980, the Bush and Reagan administrations opposed it and despite repeated hearings and recommendations from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for its ratification, the United States is still not a party to the Convention. [read post]